Cthulhu

The Archmage's Attaché

« Older   Newer »
  Share  
Venenos
view post Posted on 7/7/2015, 08:53




"ignoring resource matching", così cita la parte finale della carta.

Questo "ignoring" si applica anche nel caso la carta sia Loyal e/o abbia steadfast?
 
Top
Henry Armitage
view post Posted on 7/7/2015, 17:16




Bella domanda! ?!?!?! Boh?!? :)
 
Top
view post Posted on 7/7/2015, 18:51
Avatar

grande antico

Group:
Administrator
Posts:
1,059

Status:


Bella domanda. :blink:

Allora dal regolamento base:
CITAZIONE
...Also note that when draining a domain to play a non-neutral card, at least one of the attached resources must be of that card’s faction (this does not apply to neutral cards). This is called making a resource match.

CITAZIONE
Steadfast
Some cards have faction symbols in their title. These symbols are part of the card’s cost. These new cards are know as Steadfast cards. When a player drains a domain in order to pay the resource cost of playing a Steadfast card, he must have at least that many resources on the total number of domains he controls (and make a resource match as normal).

CITAZIONE
Loyal
When a player drains a domain in order to pay the resource cost of playing a card with the Loyal keyword, the domain must contain enough resources of that card’s faction to pay for its entire cost (normally, only one resource match is sufficient).

e dalle FAQ:
CITAZIONE
(2.15) Resource Match Card effects that grant a resource match do not affect other costs, such as Steadfast. Resource match effects do, however, affect Loyal cards unless otherwise stated in game text.

dato che qui la terminologia non è la stessa si può solo ipotizzare che a "ignoring resource matching" si applichino le considerazioni di "grant a resource match", in questo caso Steadfast non ne sarebbe toccato in quanto requisiti/costo aggiuntivo, ma Loyal si ignorerebbe in quanto estensione del resource match.

Mia personalissima opinione tutta da verificare. :wacko:
 
Top
Venenos
view post Posted on 7/7/2015, 20:15




Affare da legulei...

Domani al lavoro ci studio se riesco...

Grazie Sadric...
 
Top
view post Posted on 13/8/2015, 19:38
Avatar

grande antico

Group:
Administrator
Posts:
1,059

Status:


Ho fatto un po di domande a Damon Stone, inizio a postare le risposte da questo topic su Archmage's Attachè

Q Archmage attaché ignore resource matching, but it also ignore loyal? And steadfast?


CT65_37

CITAZIONE
".... Also note that when draining a domain to play a non-neutral card, at least one of the attached resources must be of that card’s faction (this does not apply to neutral cards). This is called making
a resource match."
Loyal
When a player drains a domain in order to pay the resource cost of playing a card with the Loyal keyword, the domain must contain enough resources of that card’s faction to pay for its entire cost
(normally, only one resource match is sufficient).

Steadfast
Some cards have faction symbols in their title. These symbols are part of the card’s cost. These new cards are know as Steadfast cards. When a player drains a domain in order to pay the resource
cost of playing a Steadfast card, he must have at least that many resources on the total number of domains he controls (and make a resource match as normal).

A Archmage’s Attaché does not ignore Loyal or Steadfast. While Loyal as a keyword is a twist on resource matching it is decidedly different. This keyword requires that all resources used to pay for a card be of the same resource. Resource matching as a mechanic requires that the drained domain contain at least one match. So they are related but the game sees them as two entirely separate mechanisms.

Quindi subisce le restrizioni del Loyal e dello Steadfast se avete particolare paura che vi si giochi contro sapete di infarcire il mazzo di carte con queste caratteristiche.

Q Once you reveal a card with Archmage's Attaché could you put in play that card with some abilities? For example, if I reveal a Master of the Myth with Archmage Attaché, can I pay 1 to put it into play? The same question for cards like Black Dog or with a Ritual of Summoning
I think the answer is no because the card only says that "you can play...." "... as it was in your hand" so the only possible thing is playing it normally. I'm right?


CT65_37CT33_051CT51_101

A You are correct. IT only allows you to play the card, not put it into play through another card effect. I believe the only exception would be to play a Dormant card, which alters how that card can be played.

questo dubbio ci era venuto durante una partita di allenamento, quindi le carte rivelate si giocano solo normalmente.
Come potete leggere l'unica eccezione potrebbe essere per le dormant, ma anche Damon non ne è sicurissimo e deve ricontrollare.
 
Top
4 replies since 7/7/2015, 08:53   79 views
  Share